Networking in VCF 9: Centralized vs Distributed Connectivity
With the release of VMware Cloud Foundation 9 (VCF 9.0), VMware has redefined the private cloud networking model by introducing both centralized and distributed connectivity. This dual approach provides flexibility for organizations to choose between traditional edge-based routing and modern, host-level distributed networking.
Why New Networking in VCF 9?
Prior to VCF 9, NSX networking was largely edge-centric—requiring dedicated Edge clusters to handle north-south traffic. This created scaling and operational overheads. VCF 9 introduces a cloud-like networking abstraction with:
-
Native VPCs (Virtual Private Clouds) for tenant isolation.
-
Transit Gateways (TGW) to interconnect VPCs and external networks.
-
Simplified bootstrapping – NSX VIBs are embedded in ESXi for easier enablement.
-
Improved lifecycle and visibility via integrated VCF Operations.
These enhancements align with VMware’s goal of offering public cloud simplicity with private cloud control.
Core Building Blocks
Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Each VPC provides isolated networking for workloads. Users can create subnets, security groups, and routing policies.
Transit Gateway (TGW)
TGWs act as the backbone of connectivity, linking multiple VPCs and connecting to external or on-prem networks.
External Connectivity Models
VCF 9 offers two approaches for north-south traffic:
-
Centralized (CTGW) – traffic flows through NSX Edge clusters.
-
Distributed (DTGW / Edgeless) – routing happens at the ESXi host level.
Centralized (CTGW) Connectivity
In the centralized model, external traffic exits via NSX Edge VMs hosting Tier-0 Gateways.
Workflow:
-
VPC traffic routes to TGW.
-
TGW connects to Tier-0 gateway on Edge Cluster.
-
Tier-0 peers (BGP/static) with physical routers.
Advantages:
-
Centralized control and policy enforcement.
-
Ideal for complex routing and multi-WAN setups.
-
Easier integration with existing NSX Edge-based services (NAT, LB).
Limitations:
-
Higher latency (additional Edge hop).
-
Resource overhead of Edge clusters.
-
Possible bottlenecks under heavy traffic.
Illustration:
Distributed (DTGW / Edgeless) Connectivity
The distributed model removes the dependency on Edge VMs. Each ESXi host becomes capable of directly routing external traffic.
Workflow:
-
TGW maps to a VLAN connected to the physical network.
-
Each host handles north-south routing directly.
-
Network services (NAT, firewall) are distributed at the host level.
Advantages:
-
Lower latency and improved performance.
-
No need for dedicated Edge nodes.
-
Simpler and more scalable for lightweight or edge deployments.
Limitations:
-
Less centralized visibility.
-
Some advanced services may still need Edge nodes.
Comparison Table
End-to-End Flow Example
-
Project Admin defines a Transit Gateway (TGW).
-
VPC Admin creates VPCs and subnets.
-
VPC traffic flows to TGW.
-
TGW connects to either:
-
Tier-0 Gateway (centralized)
-
VLAN uplink (distributed)
-
-
External IPs and BGP peering complete the setup.
Visual Flow:
When to Choose Each Model
Hybrid adoption is also supported—some domains can run centralized edges while others leverage distributed exits.
Extract:
-
VCF 9 unifies NSX networking into a modern, VPC-driven model.
-
Distributed networking simplifies infrastructure for smaller or edge environments.
-
Centralized networking remains relevant for policy-rich or complex routing needs.
-
Together, they deliver flexibility, scalability, and cloud-like networking agility.
Resources good to have on this
Thanks for the reading . Happy learning 😊
Comments
Post a Comment